Thanks for rating this article:

0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 0 Vote(s)

Should Kids Be Forced To Do Overnight Visits?

We all know that in most situations involving separation and divorce, the children of the marriage nonetheless benefit from having frequent and regular contact with both parents.  This often involves one parent having primary custody, and the other having liberal access including overnight visits where appropriate. 

But what happens if the child doesn’t want to stay overnight?

This was the situation in a recent Ontario spousal support case called Bunce v. Peacock.    The parents had one child, who was now 13 years old.  Under a 2004 consent order the mother had custody, but the father had liberal access including alternating weekends, mid-week overnight visits, and entire weeks in the summer.

- Article Continued Below -


To Our Newsletter

However, in 2010 the boy indicated that he no longer wanted to do overnight visits with the father (and this was despite the fact that he still slept over at his grandparents’ and at his friends’ homes periodically).

The father asked the court for an order specifically giving him access to the boy that spanned overnight. The court declined to grant it.  

Taking into account the fact that the boy had some health problems, difficulty with unfamiliar environments, and a learning disorder, the court felt that daytime access to the father – which would be frequent – was the best way to stay within the boy’s comfort zone.  Otherwise, the court would essentially be forcing the boy to have overnight visits with his father against his will; this was not an experiment that was recommended by experts. 

Have questions about the day-to-day elements of custody and access?  Contact us to learn more!

Please rate this article:

0 Vote(s)
The materials contained in this website are intended to provide general information and comment only and should not be relied or construed as legal advice or opinion. While we endeavor to keep the information on this web site as up to date, accurate and complete as reasonably possible, we do not warrant the completeness, timeliness or accuracy of anything contained in this web site. The application and impact of laws can vary widely, based on the specific facts involved. For any particular fact situation, we urge you to consult an experienced lawyer with any specific legal questions you may have. Your use of this website doe not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. Should you wish to retain our firm, kindly contact our office to set up a meeting with a lawyer.