dad fails in bid to appeal large monthly support order family law toronto

Thanks for rating this article:

0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 0 Vote(s)

Dad Fails in Bid to Appeal $25,000 Monthly Support Order

We have all heard the often-sensational stories of former spouses who have been ordered by a court to pay excessive-sounding support payments to their Exes.  Those of you who read this Blog regularly will know that in Ontario, the amount of support owed by one spouse to the other will depend on a number of factors, most predominantly each former partner’s means, needs and ability to pay.

In a case called Cameron v. Cameron, 2013 CarswellOnt 3926, 2013 ONSC 1192, 227 A.C.W.S. (3d) 12, [2013] W.D.F.L. 3752, the husband had been ordered on a temporary basis to pay over $25,000 per month to his former wife, based on his annual income of almost $609,000.   This was actually less than the wife’s requested amount, which she had calculated based on the couple’s lifestyle during the marriage.  The husband asked the Divisional Court for permission to appeal the order forcing him to pay.

The court refused.    In arriving at the $25,000 figure, the judge making the initial order had relied on the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines (SSAG), which in Ontario are used by courts to determine the range of suggested appropriate spousal support payments based on income and other factors.

- Article Continued Below -


To Our Newsletter

While the husband was correct in pointing out that the SSAG do not apply in cases where a paying spouse’s annual income exceeds $350,000, his further assumption – that they impose a cap on the support to be ordered in those cases – was incorrect.   Rather, the SSAG could always be considered a starting-point for a judge to consider, based on all the usual relevant circumstances.

While it may have been on the high end, the $25,000 per month was in the realm of what was reasonable in the couples’ overall situation, and the judge had made no error in his reasoning around the SSAG’s applicability.  In any case, temporary spousal support orders are discretionary and very fact-based, and so the matter would be revisited in full at the couple’s later trial.

Do you have a question about what level of spousal support you might be liable to pay upon separation or divorce?  Contact us for a consultation.

Please rate this article:

0 Vote(s)
The materials contained in this website are intended to provide general information and comment only and should not be relied or construed as legal advice or opinion. While we endeavor to keep the information on this web site as up to date, accurate and complete as reasonably possible, we do not warrant the completeness, timeliness or accuracy of anything contained in this web site. The application and impact of laws can vary widely, based on the specific facts involved. For any particular fact situation, we urge you to consult an experienced lawyer with any specific legal questions you may have. Your use of this website doe not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. Should you wish to retain our firm, kindly contact our office to set up a meeting with a lawyer.