taking the law into your own hands can be costly family law toronto

Thanks for rating this article:

0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 0 Vote(s)

Thinking of Taking the Law into Your Own Hands? It Can Be Costly

It goes without saying that Ontario family law and related legal procedures are in place for a reason:  The orderly, predictable, and fair resolution of legal disputes is one of the foundational principles of Canadian society.

So what happens when litigants try to take the law into their own hands?

In a recent case called McSkimming v. Schmuck (2014), 2014 CarswellOnt 8435, Moore J. (Ont. S.C.J.), the husband decided – on his own initiative – to reduce the spousal support payments that he had been ordered by an arbitrator to pay.  As a result, the wife had no choice but to bring a court motion to force him to pay support at the previously-ordered level, and had even offered to settle the motion beforehand, which offer the husband refused.  Needless to say, the wife’s motion was successful.

- Article Continued Below -


To Our Newsletter

Indeed, when it came time to apportion legal costs for the unnecessary proceedings, the husband conceded her full success; however he quibbled with the amount.    The court assessing costs had set them at more than $6,500, payable immediately; he felt it should be less but offered little in explanation as to why.

The husband later appealed the ruling against him, and the wife brought a motion to have that appeal thrown out.  She was successful on that too, and the appeal costs against the husband were set at an additional $17,000.

In finding that the husband’s motion and appeal strategy and his decision to unilaterally cease paying full support were both calculated to harm the wife, the court said:

I found that the [husband] had taken the law into his own hands, an affront to this court’s process that cannot be condoned. I found that the [husband] had not come before this court with clean hands and that he had attempted to manipulate the appeal process to his own ends.

In other words, the husband’s decision not to abide by the arbitrator’s order had inflicted harm on the wife both financially and emotionally, and was part of an orchestrated and deliberate plan on his part. This amounted to bad faith conduct, which was a factor to be considered in setting the legal costs he should pay.

Is your Ex trying to take the law into his or her own hands?  Contact us for a consultation.

Please rate this article:

0 Vote(s)
The materials contained in this website are intended to provide general information and comment only and should not be relied or construed as legal advice or opinion. While we endeavor to keep the information on this web site as up to date, accurate and complete as reasonably possible, we do not warrant the completeness, timeliness or accuracy of anything contained in this web site. The application and impact of laws can vary widely, based on the specific facts involved. For any particular fact situation, we urge you to consult an experienced lawyer with any specific legal questions you may have. Your use of this website doe not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. Should you wish to retain our firm, kindly contact our office to set up a meeting with a lawyer.